The present phase of 36-day long agitation by the CJP at the Jantar Mantar in New Delhi culminated on 20 July, 2026 when it organized ‘Sansad Chalo’ march on that day. Thousands of students and youths took part in this march. The agitation came to end on 25 July, 2026 following the compromise between the CJP representatives and the union government. The compromise was, as reported on three key demands of of CJP:
- Resignation of the Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan
- One crore compensation to the each family of the students, who committed suicide during the NEET paper leak and cancellation.
- Withdrawal of All FIRs against the students who participated in the march and agitation in Delhi and other states.
After the compromise, the CJP has alleged that FIR is not withdrawn against all students in view of the Supreme Court order which held that investigation will go on against those which have criminal background. The CJP has threatened to launch another agitation if FIRs are not withdrawn unconditionally. This is the present status of this agitation and compromise.
What is the message of CJP agitation and its compromise with Government?
There are two broad strands of this messaging-
- The opposition parties declare it as the victory of democracy and youth power against the government which has been adamant not to accept such popular demands. In last 12 years no BJP minister has resigned under the popular pressure. This is the broad message conveyed by the opposition parties and certain civil society groups. The opposition parties mainly congress hope to get benefit of this message in coming Assembly and parliamentary elections.
- The Second message inherent in this event was that the BJP is always willing to listen to the demands of the students and youth of the country. the statements of top leaders of the government as well as the actions of the government for the reforms of the examination system. Following the resignation of the Union Education Minister, the senior leader and the Home Minister remarked that for the BJP, the country, youth, and students are far more important than any position. The Government also brought immediately the public examination Bill which provides stringent penalty and punishment for those who use any unfair means in the public examinations. The Government has also appointed the a high level six-member Committee headed by Nandan Nilekani to suggest reforms in the examination system of India.
Also, in democracy, it is not a demerit of the ruling party to listen, compromise and address popular demands. But it is the strength of democracy. Thus, the ruling party was also poised to take the benefit of the message that it is youth friendly regime, if other things remain same. However, the ruling party may lose the benefits of the above message due to the reactions of middle and lower leadership and affiliate organizations. Now at middle /lower level BJP leadership, there are voices of criticizing students and their agitation on various grounds like the culture of Gen-Z or the foreign funding of the agitation or the students are useless and so on. If the BJP fails to control this reaction at the ground level, the it will lose the benefit of the message that it is youth-friendly regime.
The point to ponder is why there is huge difference in messaging of ruling party at higher level and the the ground level. This is the question which is imbedded in the very dynamics of political power everywhere and the political culture of this country. Perhaps no party can escape this power dynamics and political culture. Yet BJP being a disciplined party may strive for a change in political culture if it wants to take the befits of the message of addressing the demands of youth of this country.
Leave a Reply